Imaginary Unit: How the Impossible Becomes Reality

Introduction

In a world where everything seems definite and structured, where the rules of mathematics appear unshakable, suddenly something impossible emerges. A number that cannot exist—yet not only does it exist, it changes the very fabric of mathematics and science.

The imaginary unit \(i\), defined as the solution to the equation \(i^2 = -1\), is not just a mathematical object. The square of a number equaling a negative one contradicts the intuition of real numbers, but it is this very contradiction that makes \(i\) unique and indispensable. The imaginary unit not only expands the boundaries of mathematics but becomes the key to a new reality—the theory of complex numbers, where the impossible finds meaning and form. This is an example of how meaning can expand form; how the impossible, the incomprehensible, initially rejected, can become the foundation of a new reality.

In this article, we will explore the history of the imaginary unit, its mathematical properties, geometric interpretation, and its role in science and technology, showing how one “impossible” number changed our understanding of the world.

1. Historical Context: Accepting the Impossible

1.1. Birth of the Impossible

The first attempts to “peer beyond the edge” of familiar numbers date back to the 16th century, when Italian mathematicians encountered equations with negative numbers under the square root—something absolutely unimaginable within the framework of classical algebra. This problem was especially acute in solving cubic equations, where expressions like \( x^2 = -1 \) appeared.

Rafael Bombelli, in 1572, in his work “L’Algebra”, not only encountered such solutions like other mathematicians of his time but for the first time formally proposed working with “imaginary” numbers. Thanks to this, it became possible to solve equations of the form \(x^3 = px + q\), where, under the root, there were values impossible from the point of view of real numbers. This was a real challenge: many regarded such numbers as fiction, sophism, something that had no right to exist.

However, the equations themselves were real problems that required solutions. It was the internal meaning of the problem, not the abstract form, that forced mathematics to look for new approaches.

1.2. The Struggle for Recognition or How Form Is Forced to Accept Meaning

For almost two centuries, imaginary numbers were considered suspicious, borderline, and even absurd. They were called “sophisms,” “fictitious,” and “nonexistent” numbers. For most mathematicians of the time, they were mathematical exotica, a convenient device for calculations, but not legitimate objects.

Only in the 18th–19th centuries, thanks to the works of scholars such as Leonhard Euler, Carl Friedrich Gauss, Jean-Robert Argand, and others, did imaginary numbers gain legitimate status.

  • Leonhard Euler, in 1777, first introduced the notation \(i\) for \(\sqrt{-1}\).
  • Carl Friedrich Gauss, in 1831, not only proposed the term “complex numbers,” but also developed their geometric interpretation on the complex plane, which made it possible to visualize working with the imaginary unit.

Complex numbers became an essential tool for solving algebraic equations, analysis, function theory, and many other fields.

They played an especially important role in understanding the very nature of equation solutions: it now turned out that even those equations that were previously considered unsolvable always have a solution—if you allow complex numbers.

Gauss proved the fundamental theorem of algebra: any algebraic equation of degree \(n\) has exactly \(n\) roots if complex numbers are considered admissible. This was a turning point—even the “impossible” acquired mathematical rights if it was needed for structural completeness.

Philosophical commentary:

The imaginary unit is an example of how dogma (“this cannot be”) was broken under the pressure of meaning arising from the problem itself. Mathematics did not dictate meaning; meaning forced mathematics to expand. Form was forced to accept new meaning in order to preserve integrity.

2. Mathematical Properties of the Imaginary Unit

2.1. Definition

The imaginary unit \(i\) is defined as: \(i = \sqrt{-1}, \quad i^2 = -1\).

This fundamental property allows the set of real numbers to be expanded to complex numbers of the form \(a + bi\), where \(a\) and \(b\) are real numbers and \(i\) is the imaginary unit. Such an expansion opens a fundamentally new mathematical layer—the field of complex numbers.

2.2. Cyclicality of Powers

The powers of \(i\) obey a surprisingly strict cyclic law:

  • \(i^1 = i\)
  • \(i^2 = -1\)
  • \(i^3 = i^2 * i = -1 * i = -i\)
  • \(i^4 = (i^2)^2 = (-1)^2 = 1\)
  • \(i^5 = i^4 * i = 1 * i = i\)

Thus, the powers \(i^n\) repeat every four steps: \(i_n = i^{n \bmod 4}\)

For example, \(i^{10} = i^2 = −1\), since \(10 \bmod 4 = 2\).

Semantic commentary:

What seemed like chaos obeys its own law. The imaginary unit is built into a structure where even the impossible becomes regular and predictable.

2.3. Complex Numbers

The imaginary unit underlies complex numbers. A complex number is written as \(z = a + b i\), where \(a\) is the real part and \(b\) is the imaginary part.

Complex numbers form a field in which all standard arithmetic operations are performed: addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

  1. Addition and Subtraction:
    \((a + bi) + (c + di) = (a + c) + (b + d)i\)
    \((a+bi)−(c+di)=(a−c)+(b−d)i\)
  2. Multiplication:
    \((a + b i)(c + d i) = a c + a d i + b c i + b d i^2 = (a c – b d) + (a d + b c) i\),
    since \(i^2 = -1\).
  3. Division:
    To divide \(\frac{a + b i}{c + d i}\), use the complex conjugate. Multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate \(c – d i\):
    \(
    \frac{a + b i}{c + d i} = \frac{(a + b i)(c – d i)}{(c + d i)(c – d i)} = \frac{(a c + b d) + (b c – a d) i}{c^2 + d^2}
    \)

.

Conjugation:
The complex conjugate of \(z = a + b i\) is \(\overline{z} = a – b i\). It satisfies the properties:
\(\overline{z_1 + z_2} = \overline{z_1} + \overline{z_2}\), \(\overline{z_1 z_2} = \overline{z_1} \cdot \overline{z_2}\), \(z \cdot \overline{z} = a^2 + b^2\).

Semantic commentary:

Operations on complex numbers are not just formal arithmetic. This is an image of how the impossible (the imaginary part) is integrated with the real, creating a new whole.

2.4. Trigonometric and Exponential Form

A complex number can be represented in trigonometric form:
\(z = r (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta)\),
where \(r = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}\) is the modulus, and \(\theta = \arctan\left(\frac{b}{a}\right)\) is the argument.

Thanks to Euler’s formula:
\(e^{i\theta} = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta\),
a complex number can be written as:
\(z = r e^{i\theta}\).

The imaginary unit in this form looks like \(i = e^{i\pi/2}\), since
\(i = \cos \frac{\pi}{2} + i \sin \frac{\pi}{2} = 0 + i \cdot 1 = i\).

Semantic commentary:

The exponential form of a complex number is the quintessence of how abstraction (the imaginary unit) connects with geometry, trigonometry, and the dynamics of movement on the plane.

3. Geometry: The Imaginary Unit on the Plane

On the complex plane, the imaginary unit \(i\) corresponds to the point \((0, 1)\). The complex number \(a + b i\) is depicted as the point \((a, b)\), where the horizontal axis is real, and the vertical is imaginary. The imaginary unit acts as a rotation operator: multiplying by \(i\) rotates a vector by 90 degrees counterclockwise:
— \(z = a + b i\),
— \(i \cdot z = i (a + b i) = a i + b i^2 = -b + a i\).

This corresponds to turning the point \((a, b)\) into \((-b, a)\).

The algebraic operation here acquires geometric meaning:
the imaginary unit, once considered a fiction, turns out to be a rotation operator, linking algebra with geometry.

Philosophical commentary:

The imaginary unit is a rotation. Not only of a vector on the plane, but also a turn of thinking: from literal reality to a multi-layered reality, full of the imaginary but effective.

4. Applications of the Imaginary Unit: How the Impossible Becomes a Tool

The imaginary unit and complex numbers are widely used in various fields of science and technology.

4.1. Electrical Engineering

In electrical engineering, complex numbers (and the imaginary unit) are indispensable.

Impedance of a circuit: \(Z = R + iX\)

where \(R\) is resistance, \(X\) is reactance.

Without complex numbers, modern theory of alternating currents, phase shifts, and signal analysis would not exist.

4.2. Signal Theory

In signal processing, complex exponentials \(e^{i\omega t}\) are the main tool for working with harmonics and frequencies.

Fourier and Laplace transforms are unthinkable without the imaginary unit.

4.3. Quantum Mechanics

In quantum mechanics, the imaginary unit appears in the Schrödinger equation, determining the fundamental properties of state evolution.

4.4. Number Theory and Algebra

Gaussian numbers (\(a + bi\), where \(a\), \(b\) are integers) are used in Diophantine equations, divisibility theory, and the construction of new algebraic structures.

4.5. Computer Graphics

Multiplying by \(i\) is a way to rotate objects by 90° on the plane.

This is used in 2D graphics, image processing, and even in fractal generation.

Semantic commentary:

What once seemed “imaginary” has become the language of modern technology and science. This is literally a demonstration of how the impossible becomes real by changing forms.

5. Interesting Facts and Paradoxes

5.1. Euler’s Formula

\(e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0\)

It unites five fundamental mathematical constants: \(e\), \(i\), \(\pi\), \(1\), \(0\).
It is considered the most beautiful formula in mathematics.

5.2. Fractals

The imaginary unit plays a key role in the construction of fractals, such as the Mandelbrot set—one of the most recognizable objects of modern mathematics, which is defined by iterating complex numbers and would not exist without the imaginary unit.

5.3. Philosophical Significance

The appearance of the imaginary unit radically changed the concept of what it means to “exist” in mathematics, showing that even “impossible” objects can be useful and have practical value. The imaginary became practical, and the impossible became necessary. Mathematics began to openly recognize: sometimes the impossible is only a temporary limitation of form, and if meaning requires more, form must change.

6. Conclusion: The Imaginary Unit as the Deconstruction of Formal Reality

The imaginary unit \(i\) is not just a mathematical curiosity, but a powerful tool that expands the boundaries of algebra and analysis, demonstrating how human thought can deconstruct familiar reality, introducing the impossible to create a more perfect and functional structure. It underlies the theory of complex numbers, which permeates many disciplines—from physics to computer science—and its properties, such as cyclic powers and geometric interpretation highlighted by Euler’s formula, reveal a deep connection with other areas of mathematics and remind us that even the most abstract concepts can have real and meaningful applications.

Deconstruction of Reality: Key Takeaways

  • The imaginary unit is an archetype of a semantic revolt against dogma.
  • It is a case where the impossible became not just possible, but fundamental.
  • Form, under the pressure of meaning, expands, and from this a new layer of reality emerges.
  • The whole history of the imaginary unit is a vivid illustration of how meaning can force form to change.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top