Duality as the Explosion of Ontology

Introduction

Many philosophical systems, scientific theories, and religious worldviews all attempt to answer the same question: what is primary? Matter or consciousness? The objective or the subjective? Most modern scientific approaches tend to favor a linear model: first there was matter, then life appeared, then consciousness.

But if we truly accept that duality is the fundamental archetype, this model collapses. The objective and the subjective are inseparable. They cannot exist without one another. They are not sequential stages but mutually dependent sides of one semantic structure.

1. The Ontological Explosion: The Subjective Cannot Be Derived

If the “objective” exists, it already presupposes a subject capable of isolating, fixing, and interpreting it as “objective.” Any attempt to derive consciousness from matter breaks the logic of observation itself. Without a subject, there is no objective world at all, because “objectivity” is already a form of semantic fixation.

Therefore, the subjective and the objective arise simultaneously, as two interdependent sides of duality. This is the explosion of ontology: the familiar picture of linear origin ceases to be logically coherent.

2. Quantum Mechanics Confirms: Reality Is Not Defined Before Observation

Quantum physics is the first exact science in which observation changes the result. Before measurement, a particle is described as a superposition of states. But the very act of measurement “forces” the universe to choose one value. This is not a technical quirk. It is proof that the subjective (the act of observation) forms the objective (the measured state).

🔹 The collapse of the wave function is not a physical impact but a semantic fixation.
🔹 This is precisely what the Deconreality philosophy calls SENSMAP — a map of meanings through which a specific route of perception is fixed.

3. The Illusion of Scientific Objectivity: FlatMind in Its Own Trap

Modern science is built on a model that excludes the subject. It tries to view the world “from the outside.” But this position is an illusion.

Every scientific theory:

• is created by a subject;
• is formed within language (a structure of meanings);
• is interpreted within consciousness.

👉 Therefore, even the most “objective” formulas are already acts of subjective semantic construction. FlatMind believes it sees “things as they are,” but it always sees through the filter of its frame. The refusal to acknowledge the subject is not a scientific virtue but a fear of full ontological duality.

4. Duality as the Fractal Archetype of Being

This structure manifests at all levels:

• wave / particle
• being / non-being
• knowledge / ignorance
• form / content
• light / darkness
• observed / observer
• consciousness / matter

These pairs are not opposites, they define each other mutually. They cannot arise separately. Like north and south on a magnet, like yin and yang, like word and silence.

Duality is not antagonism. It is a branching of semantic structure.

Every act of perception is a choice of route through the field of duality. It is not a war between poles but a vibration between them, a fluctuation within the semantic space.

5. Conclusion: The Return of Meaning as the Foundation of Reality

Materialism is not just a philosophy. It is an attempt to ignore half of being. It wants to see only form but not meaning. Only measurement, not the observer. Only structure, not motion.

But in a dual world, you cannot exclude one half without destroying the entire picture.

When we accept duality as fundamental:

• we step beyond the FlatMind,
• we cease to fear the subjective,
• we restore meaning to its rightful ontological place.

Consciousness is not produced by matter. Consciousness and matter are two sides of the same semantic act.

This understanding lies at the heart of the Deconstruction of Reality project. We do not seek answers in one-sided theories. We return to living meaning, where everything exists in mutual branching — where the objective and the subjective are not enemies but a dance.

---

🌀 This is the semantic breakthrough.

Measure — but remember who holds the ruler.
Look — but remember through whose gaze you see.

Meaning is not a superstructure.
It is the structure of being itself.