Lex Humanitas reveals where form hides power and replaces meaning.

Priority Hierarchy for Texts (Lawsuits, Claims, Explanations)

Purpose

To establish a working rule that helps determine when a document is ready and prevents endless revisions.


Priority Levels

1) Completeness of Meaning (Critical Level)

A document is not ready until this level has been satisfied.

Criteria:
– all key facts are stated;
– significant events are reflected;
– evidence is mentioned;
– contradictions are documented;
– a causal chain has been constructed.

Check:

Is there anything important that has not been said?

If yes, continue working.

2) Logical Coherence (Construction)

Check whether the text withstands a sequential reading.

Criteria:
– there are no logical gaps;
– there are no internal contradictions;
– the arguments are connected;
– it is clear what the conclusion follows from.

Check:

Does the logic break down when the text is read in sequence?

3) Structural Clarity

This is a level of improvement, not a mandatory condition of readiness.

This includes:
– separating facts from conclusions;
– ordering the sections;
– avoiding premature transitions;
– a modular presentation.

Check:

Can the structure be made cleaner without changing the meaning?

If yes, this is an optional refinement.

4) Style

This is also a level of improvement.

This includes:
– phrasing;
– repetitions;
– readability and concision;
– how “polished” the text is.

Check:

Will the text become more pleasant to read?


Key Stopping Rule

A document is considered ready when:
– level 1 (completeness of meaning) has been satisfied;
– level 2 (logical coherence) has been satisfied.

Levels 3–4 are areas for optional improvements.


Additional Rule

If an edit does not add new meaning, it is not a reason to postpone submitting the document.


Short Checklist

  1. Has everything important been said?
  2. Does the logic hold together?

If both answers are “yes,” submit the text; everything else can be improved afterward.

Scroll to Top